Needed a mental break from all the assessment stuff I’ve been working on, so I reached into my “to read” pile and pulled out a paper on incentives in social computing (pdf) that looks, in part, at how people use del.icio.us in information discovery.
The thing that stood out to me was this: People are much more likely to find information through a user than through a tag. Although tags get used to find pages bookmarked by oneself, finding pages bookmarked by others is usually done by subscribing to others’ feeds (here’s my network) or by clicking on the “saved by X others” link (an example).
First off, this is exactly how I use del.icio.us. On the rare occasions I’ve tried to do a search of the site as a whole it’s been worse than useless, and I’ve had the same difficulties with subscribing to tags as the authors describe.
However, they do seem to downplay the importance of tags for the social aspect of the site — something which does not conform to my own use. When I browse through the bookmarks in my network, I use the tags to help decide whether it’s something in which I’m interested. Since site titles can be misleading or uninformative, and most people do not regularly add user notes for their bookmarks, tags are often the only way I have of judging the usefulness of a site without clicking through.
I also use tags when deciding whether to add someone to my network if I don’t know them in real life or through their blog. For example, go back to the last link above and look at the list of people who have bookmarked the site. See all the ones with “system: unfiled” next to the user name? That means the user didn’t bother to add tags. No point in looking at their bookmarks if I’m not going to be able to tell what they’re about! Also, I’m more likely to add someone to my network if they have their tags organized into folders — this makes it much easier for me to see how much overlap there is in our interests.
So even though tags aren’t helpful when I’m searching other people’s bookmarks, they are a big part of how I make judgment calls when browsing. But maybe that’s just the librarian in me?
March 12, 2008 at 11:57 am
Interesting. While still a novice blogger & new to social tagging, my experience tracks closely with yours. For me it’s: first, visit the site, and next, check the tags. Although tags are of limited use. A user-defined taxonomy may be democratic but is inefficient in categorizing anything. BTW, I find Resource Shelf an excellent resource on many subjects: http://www.resourceshelf.com/index.php?s=tagging
MadSilence
March 13, 2008 at 8:26 am
Yes, Resource Shelf is a great resource and one of my favourites.
The authors of that paper do go into the whole tags-are-not-standardized thing, but frankly I’m kind of tired of hearing about it. My personal feeling is that when we try to compare tags and formal taxonomies, we’re making the erroneous assumption that they’re functioning in precisely the same way and therefore should operate identically.
I don’t want my tags to function like a formal taxonomy — the whole point is to be able to apply words that will help me with findability. If they help someone else, so much the better. On the other hand, a formal taxonomy has to help anyone who might come along and most certainly needs to be standardized.
Seems to me that it’s a case of comparing apples to oranges. They’re both fruit, but many recipes that call for one wouldn’t taste very good with the other substituted because they compliment different flavours.
March 13, 2008 at 12:14 pm
Of course you do. Know about ResourceShelf, that is. And you’re probably familar with http://lii.org/ as well. My bad.
As for tags & findability, isn’t that the whole point? I find WordPress’ Tag Surfer function pretty much useless. Multiple users define the tag “Art” in so many different ways, never consistently. Many view tags as a way to generate more blog hits, not as a useful tool to help with findability. There are online tools that assist the blogger in finding frequently used tags to maximize hits, not useful meaning.
A personalized tagging taxonomy is fine if it helps the user retrieve what they’ve cataloged. But I want more insights into the tagger’s mind which I can’t obtain without understanding your personal taxonomy.
Many public cultural institutions have started public tagging projects. I’m not sure what they hope to gain from uncontrolled babble. Perhaps I need to put more in depth study into tagging. I’m preparing a future blog post on the subject: your comments will be welcome.
Check out:
http://madsilence.wordpress.com/2008/01/02/can-you-blog-fashionably/
MadSilence
March 13, 2008 at 2:16 pm
You’re right about the WordPress tag surfer — people do seem to use their tags as a way to drive traffic as much as for findability. On the other hand, just because a post tagged “library” has to do with programming and not the institution doesn’t mean that it isn’t useful to someone; just not me. I always imagine the programmers getting peeved because of all the “we went to the liberry and check out books” posts that they might find themselves wading through.
On the “babble” factor, you might try reading this. If I’m remembering correctly, there’s a bit in there about how it doesn’t matter if everyone tags things the same way. Only one person has to tag something the same way I would for me to be able to find it.
March 15, 2008 at 7:26 pm
[...] school student Kirsten of Into the Stacks has some interesting thoughts about tagging: When I browse through the bookmarks in my network, I use the tags to help decide whether it’s [...]
March 27, 2008 at 6:32 am
Hi Kristen, we just got done discussing tagging in my Info Behavior class, my group put together a tagging project using del.icio.us too. I started thinking about how I use tagging in del.icio.us and I think I use it more just to find my own stuff. I do a lot of searching my tags through the del.icio.us browser extension which brings my bookmarks into my browser, it’s pretty handy.
I don’t think I use del.icio.us as a search engine though, if anything I do that more with Lifehacker because I’m usually pretty sure that whatever I am looking for was covered on that website
But I do like your point of using the tags to getting to know the interests of a person you might not otherwise know, tags can be very personal and very revealing!
March 27, 2008 at 7:20 am
I also use delicious pretty much the same way as you said but I think tags have more to offer. You cannot underestimate tags.
I mean I do subscribe to other users but I have also subscribed to a few tags and I do find good relevant links on my tag subscriptions.